People who know me know that from time to time I enjoy reminiscing about the halcyon days of alternative rock in the late '90s and early '00s. Sometimes it's getting really drunk and forcing everyone nearby to sing along as I play "Semi-Charmed Life" by Third Eye Blind on an acoustic guitar (it's G-D-C9, by the way, not too tough, and people really like it when you just go DOO DOO DOO DOO DOO DOO DOO DOO over and over again instead of singing the verses, because no one knows any of the words to verses except for that line which I think is "she gives me head"). Sometimes I just run around campus with my arm straight in front of me smashing shit, and when people ask me what I'm doing, I just say, "Re-enacting the music video of Korn's Freak on a Leash." I even followed every single step in Blink-182's "Adam's Song" when I was depressed and contemplating suicide*, and let me tell you, that brought my spirits back faster than any therapist's bullshit. I fucking loved life that day.
Of course, not every band from that era was quite as good as Blink, or Korn (Blogger doesn't support a reversed-R feature, I need to start a petition about that), or 3IB (how fans abbreviate Third Eye Blind.) I don't remember a single song by Better than Ezra or Less Than Jake, only their names. But their names have raised several interesting puzzles.
First, why don't more bands define their quality in terms of their relationship to a marginally specified generic male name? With these two, it's clear. Better Than Ezra
are better than Ezra, mainly because Ezra probably does less rockin' and more prophesying the fiery destruction of Nineveh. Less Than Jake, on the other hand - I mean, self-deprecation is what the kids are into. Or were into. Regardless of whether or not the kids are still into self-deprecation, it's clear that from their band name Less Than Jake convey the teenage wasteland of existential dread they lived through and want to guide their fans through as well. Jake - I mean, that kid's a fucking toolbag. Have you ever met him? He has these thick glasses and a nerdy voice but he still thinks she's so suave and all the ladies are after him (he uses the word ladies all the time too, he just says shit like "Oh, bet the ladies are totally going to dig this" and it isn't funny or anything, just annoying. He always does the whole "I drank so much last night" thing even when he had like three or four beers and just gets you into these bullshit conversations about how awesome he is for drinking, because he's the only kid on campus who's that ballsy.) He has this whole self-righteous shit going on when you talk to him too, all cocky moderate liberalism... Anyway, I mean seriously. You know the guy (note: if you do actually know a Jake and he is at all like this, or is not at all like this but is still unpleasant, my condolences. I do not know a Jake. If you know a Jake and he is cool, it doesn't really tell you very much about Less Than Jake because they could still be cool, just not as cool as Cool Jake, so, you know, whatever.) Less Than Jake are less than this guy. That is pretty fucking low. Damn.
Band Names I Am Now Considering:
Roughly Equivalent to Alan
Greater Than Or Equal To Stanley
Times Square Bootleg Version of Hank
Bill Without The Ever-Present Girlfriend
Can Condescend To Tom
Not As Well Read As David
Jewish Version of Frank
Rebound Hookup After Jeremiah
Platonic Form Of Andy
There is, in my mind, one final question posed by these two bands. How do Jake and Ezra compare to each other? This can only be accomplished in a vague mathematical proof-esque style.
Given:
Band1 > Ezra
Band2 < Jake
In order to make any further progress, we need raw, empirical data that can be plugged into these equations. We need statistics. We need quantitative evaluation of mediocre music. There is only one place to turn, and that is Pitchforkmedia's rigorous grading standards--I mean, sorry, sorry, I promise, Metacritic.
On Metacritic, "Closer" by Better Than Ezra gets a 64, while Less Than Jake's "Anthem" scores 71. This suggests Band1 < Band 2.
Jake > Band 2 > Band 1 > Ezra --> Jake > Ezra.
This result is vaguely consistent with the band names, since the bands received roughly the same amount of success (by my standards, which means that they are vague ironic touchstones and not a single song I can name), yet one was better than someone and the other was less, suggesting that both bands would be better than the same dude and worse than the other one. However, I'm not entirely satisfied with the results, so as soon as I can crank out a couple trusty algorithms according to the ThoughtfulConsiderater Guidelines for Quantitatively Evaluating Hilariously Poor Music (Tristan Cockburn,** Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2003). Onward, SCIENCE!
*Note: did not actually happen, in case you're worried. If I were considering suicide, this blog would of course be my outlet for my emotional trauma.
**Tristan Cockburn is not a music critic and actually writes about fantasy baseball for ESPN.com. However, his name is so hilarious that I have vowed to incorporate it into every single thing I write.